General

Asset deal vs. share deal – differences and advantages

From: Marco Stricker

Head of Corporate Finance, Co-Head of Mergers & Acquisitions | Prokurist

When selling or buying a company, there are a number of specific aspects to consider. One question that often arises is the transaction structure for the acquisition of a company. Basically, this can be done through a so-called asset deal or share deal. In this article, we will discuss the differences as well as the advantages and disadvantages.

Table of contents

    Asset deal and share deal: definition and characteristics

    An asset deal or share deal determines the structure of a company transfer. These are therefore two different forms of company acquisition. The basis for the definition is the respective object of purchase.

    In a share deal, all rights and obligations of the former owner are transferred to the purchaser, who now becomes a shareholder. Depending on the type of business, the object of purchase in a share deal can be shares in a limited liability company (GmbH), shares in a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft), or shares in a partnership (Personengesellschaft). The sale is usually carried out by the shareholders.

    An asset deal describes the acquisition of individual assets and liabilities. The scope can be determined as desired. This means that certain items, divisions, or a location of the company can be taken over. The sale of the economic goods is carried out via the company.

    Differences between asset deals and share deals

    The differences between asset deals and share deals can be summarized as follows:

    Transfer of liabilities and assets: In an asset deal, specific liabilities and assets are transferred. A share deal involves the transfer of all company shares.

    Required approvals and consents: Depending on the type of transaction, various approvals and consents may be required. These could include regulatory authorities, shareholders, or creditors.

    Handling of employment contracts:

    In an asset deal, the employees’ employment contracts are transferred or renegotiated. In a share deal, the employment relationships generally remain unchanged.

    Treatment of hidden reserves:

    In a share deal, hidden reserves may remain. In an asset deal, disclosure is possible.

    Carrying amount of the transferred assets:

    If an asset deal takes place, the book value of the assets may change. In a share deal, it usually remains unchanged.

    Asset deal or share deal?

    Both asset deals and share deals have certain advantages and disadvantages for buyers and sellers. In order to make the right decision, all advantages and disadvantages must be thoroughly weighed up. Comprehensive due diligence, in which all legal, economic, business, and tax circumstances of a company are analyzed and examined, reveals potential opportunities and risks.


    Asset deal: advantages and disadvantages

    It is advantageous for the buyer to select specific assets and liabilities for acquisition. This allows them to avoid undesirable parts of the business, including encumbered assets, as well as certain risks associated with the company being acquired. This limits liability risk and facilitates the integration of the acquired parts of the company.

    However, it is very important to ensure that every asset to be transferred is documented. If assets are forgotten, the seller will often demand additional and excessive compensation. One of the biggest disadvantages of an asset deal is the contractual relationships between the seller and third parties, such as suppliers or customers. These parties must agree to the transfer, which may mean that the existing terms and conditions could be improved.

    Share deal: advantages and disadvantages

    The share deal is usually the more attractive option from a tax perspective. In the context of business succession, many obligations can be transferred in an uncomplicated manner. This often makes the transfer of liability more favorable for the seller. However, the buyer may attempt to limit liability through so-called warranty clauses. In principle, the share deal involves less effort.

    Conclusion:

    Asset deals and share deals offer different approaches to acquiring a company. In an asset deal, the buyer selectively acquires specific assets and liabilities, whereas in a share deal, the entire company is taken over. Both structures have their advantages and disadvantages and should be discussed and carefully weighed on a case-by-case basis. Professional support from an M&A advisory firm can help in making the complex decision regarding the appropriate transaction structure.

    Do you need help choosing the transaction type?

    Whether a share deal or asset deal is more suitable depends largely on the initial business situation. Tax aspects must also be considered. The choice should always be based on comprehensive due diligence. In any case, professional expertise is advisable. Take advantage of our know-how and many years of experience in this field. We will be happy to help you successfully complete the transaction.

    Any questions?

    Call us or arrange a non-binding consultation

    Weitere interessante Beiträge

    Handschlag im Meeting symbolisiert Unternehmensbeteiligung

    Company Sale

    What are corporate investments?

    17.04.2026 | Dennis Volter

    Beitrag lesen

    AUTHOR

    Marco Stricker

    Head of Corporate Finance, Co-Head of Mergers & Acquisitions | Prokurist

    Marco Stricker has many years of experience in the banking and leasing sectors as well as in corporate finance. After completing his banking apprenticeship, Marco Stricker gained experience in refinancing, controlling, credit analysis, and receivables management during his total of nine years at one of the largest bank- and manufacturer-independent leasing companies in Germany. During his nearly 16 years at Conpair, Mr. Stricker primarily managed capital market and equity transactions as well as structured finance projects. In addition, he has extensive experience in M&A transactions and credit monitoring. The industry focus of his work at Conpair AG lies in the industrial sector. In 2019, he was granted procuration at Conpair AG.